For a pdf of this article, click here.
Strategy execution is about getting other people, and yourself, to do things – the right things. And that doesn’t happen in the typical, annual strategic planning ritual where people throw around some ideas and then check in a year later. Like weighing yourself every morning or checking your car’s fuel gauge when you get in the car, we all need to know how we’re doing while there’s still time to act. One of the simplest and best tactics in the struggle to execute strategy is the “goal review meeting.” In goal review meetings the team executing a strategic plan assesses their progress against that plan. The team might be the senior-most one in the organization or it might be departmental, or anything in between, including a project team. As long as they’ve broken their strategy(s) into goals with individual accountability, this approach will work. (If they haven’t done that – well, that would be the place to start.) For years, we’ve been helping our clients with these meetings, and we’ve learned six success factors that make them work. #1: Include the right people The people who are accountable for executing the plan are the ones who attend the goal reviews. That means the team leader – say, CEO – must be in the meeting, and so must those direct reports who each own a portion of the plan. That’s two tiers of management; don’t crowd three or four tiers of management into a room. If the plan cascades down through the organization, then each subordinate team can hold its own meetings for its portion of the plan. Sending delegates to the meeting instead of the accountable parties is generally a no-no. And if the boss can’t attend then the meeting should simply be rescheduled. These meetings require that the people who are accountable stand in front of boss and peers and describe their progress. When substitute players are sent in, the meetings lose their effect. Staff members who can contribute should also be invited. For example, if the organization possesses a planning staff – people who look after the planning process – then members of that staff should naturally attend. In fact, they should facilitate the meetings if they have the training to do so. If specialized topics will be discussed, then summon the specialists. For example, if legal matters will be discussed, consider inviting corporate counsel as a resource to answer questions. #2: Meet often enough to matter Most organizations we’ve worked with hold their strategic goal review meetings monthly, bimonthly, or quarterly (never less often than quarterly). Project goal review meetings are typically held weekly. What’s the best frequency? Meet more frequently when launching an effort, because the plan is still being tested and understood. The people and the plan both need more frequent cycles in early phases. You can throttle back a little – say, from biweekly meetings to a six-week cycle – after it’s clear that everyone is up and running. Also lean toward more frequent meetings if you are imposing a lot of change on your organization or if the environment is imposing a lot of changes on your organization. Think of how often you make steering adjustments when you are driving a car fast, or when the road changes frequently. Same idea. Frequent meetings accomplish several things:- Focus: They keep people focused on execution. Day-to-day distractions tempt us all hugely, so the pressure to report progress in goal review meetings keeps everyone moving ahead and aimed in the right direction.
- Flexibility: They keep us agile. As people get into strategy execution, opportunities and problems are revealed and the team needs to respond accordingly. For example, one team member says, “I’ve got three people out with the flu, so I’m at a standstill on this.” Another team member says, “I can loan you a couple of my people for a week.” Or the boss can say, “Outsource that piece so we can move ahead.”
- Alignment: These meetings not only help the organization stay focused and flexible, but they also keep team members flying in formation with each other and constantly mindful of how they are affecting each other. Expressed less positively, these meetings make it much harder for one person to “succeed” at the expense of teammates.
- What was the status of this goal last time I reported (red, yellow, or green)?
- What is it now?
- What are my key strategies for achieving this goal?
- What are my key strategies for preventing collateral damage?
- What is the “actual vs. plan” on milestones or key activities?
- What are the greatest risks (internal or external) to success?
- What are my risk mitigation strategies?
- Where do I need help from either peers or boss?*
- Ensure that there is cross-talk among the team members, not just a hub and spoke discussion with the boss.
- Keep track of – and post – agreements and decisions made last time, so you don’t keep re-deciding the same thing.
- Pull quiet members into the discussion, especially when it’s obviously a topic of interest or relevance to them.
Published: August 6, 2015
Leave a comment!